WASHINGTON (MarketWatch) — House Democrats unveiled a sweeping health-care overhaul bill on Tuesday that aims to lower costs, cover the uninsured and force employers to offer coverage, saying they plan to pass the historic legislation before their August recess.

The bill would tax wealthy Americans to help pay for an overhaul, putting a graduated surcharge on those making more than $350,000 a year. For families earning between $350,000 and $500,000, the tax would be 1%; for those making $500,000 to $1 million the tax would be 1.5%. Read more. The tax, or surcharge as it is being referred to in the bill, would only apply to the amount of income exceeding $350,000 or the agreed-upon threshold.

President Barack Obama praised the bill even before Democrats went before cameras on Capitol Hill on Tuesday afternoon to roll it out, saying it begins to fix what’s broken in the U.S. health-care system.

“This proposal controls the skyrocketing cost of health care by rooting out waste and fraud and promoting quality and accountability,” Obama said in a statement.

House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, D-Calif., said Tuesday that she expects a House vote on the bill before her chamber leaves for its August recess on July 31.

“Inaction is not an option for us,” she said.

The bill, which totals more than 1,000 pages, is broadly in line with Obama’s goals and immediately drew fire from Republicans.

It requires employers to offer insurance coverage to their workers and imposes penalties on individuals who don’t buy insurance. It also sets up a public health-insurance option, which would compete with private insurers. Also under the bill, insurers wouldn’t be able to deny coverage to individuals with pre-existing conditions. See bill text.

Democrats in the House and Senate have been aiming to pass health-care reform bills before their August breaks. Democrats and Obama are attempting to cover the 47 million uninsured Americans.

Read more …

 

Pajamas TV‘s Steven Crowder goes to Canada and films a guerrilla-style documentary about what the typical Canadian citizen must undergo to receive treatment under the country’s socialized medical system. Watch below, and send to others!

Tagged with:
 

Max Baucus on how to pay for health care

By Carrie Budoff Brown and David Rigers (Politico.com)

Senate Finance Committee Chairman Max Baucus (D-Mont.) presented his members Thursday with more than a dozen ways to pay for health care legislation, ranging from new fees on industry to an income-tax hike on couples making more than $1 million a year.

Faced with a $320 billion hole in his reform plan, Baucus revisited options that were considered in the past, but never emerged as top-tier options because he believed taxing employer-provided health benefits was the best way to provide that revenue.

The Senate Democratic leadership nixed the idea this week, saying the caucus could not support it because it would hurt the middle class. They asked Baucus, who was closing in on a deal, to go back to the negotiating table and find a more politically viable plan to pay for the $1 trillion reform bill.

Instead of relying on one major source of funding, the committee will have to piece together revenue from a variety of places. The list, as detailed to POLITICO by people familiar with the negotiations, shows senators could fill the $320 billion gap quickly if they were able to find consensus to:

  • Broaden the 1.45-percent Medicare tax on earned income to “passive income,” which could include money from capital gains, rental properties and businesses that do not require direct participation. This could raise $100 billion.
  • Levy a five-percent surtax on individuals who earn more than $500,000 and couples that make $1 million.
  • Tax health benefits at a higher level than had been considered. Two scenarios are in play. Taxing plans worth more than $20,300 for a family and $8,300 for an individual could raise $240 billion. Increasing the cut-off to plans worth more than $25,000 would bring $90 billion.
  • Capping the tax break on itemized deductions at 28 percent, as President Barack Obama had proposed, or freezing the top deduction rate at 35 percent when the Bush tax cuts expire in 2010. The first scenario would raise $168 billion, while the second would collect $90 billion.
  • Issue tax credit bonds to pay for the proposed Medicaid expansion, raising $75 billion.
  • Charge fees to pharmaceutical manufacturers, bringing in as much as $20 billion, and insurance providers, raising $75 billion.

Read more …

Tagged with:
 

WASHINGTON (AP) – The drive to remake the nation’s health care system suffered yet another setback in Congress on Thursday when a pivotal group of House Democrats rebelled against leadership-backed legislation taking shape and sought additional time to make changes.

“We need to slow down and do it right,” Rep. Mike Ross, D-Ark., said outside a meeting of the Blue Dog Coalition, a group of 52 moderate to conservative Democrats. “It needs to do a much better job of cost containment” within the health care system, he added.

Other lawmakers said they were concerned about proposed tax increases, the rules on any government-sold insurance, and other issues that are key to implementing President Barack Obama’s call for sweeping legislation.

Ross said the group was drafting a letter to the Democratic leadership asking for additional time. Although he did not specify how much time, he said he believes no vote should take place until the fall – well after a midsummer informal deadline set by House Speaker Nancy Pelosi.

Read more …

 

Following statewide protests July 2 against a bill that supports socialized health care, Tea Party groups across Florida will hold protests July 9 at rallies organized by a nonprofit that supports President Obama’s plan for a government-controlled health care system.

MoveOn.org members will hold Public Option Now! Health Care Rallies outside local senators’ offices to urge legislators to support the Affordable Health Choices Act — and Tea Party Patriots will be present to fight against the group’s campaign. In South Florida, rally locations include Republican Sen. Mel Martinez’s offices in Palm Beach Gardens and Coral Gables as well as Democratic Sen. Bill Nelson’s offices in West Palm Beach and Coral Gables.

The Affordable Health Choices Act — proposed by the Senate Health, Education and Labor Committee — seeks to, among other actions: expand Medicaid to 150 percent of the federal poverty level; tax citizens who cannot show they are covered by government-defined “qualified” health insurance; and establish numerous government-appointed committees to certify and inform citizens about insurance plans.

To find the location and time of a rally near you, click here.

For more information about the South Florida Tea Party, click here.

What: Protest against MoveOn.org’s health care rallies.
When: July 9, times varied by location.
Where: Your local senators’ office.
For more information: Click here.

Patriot

 

Attention, Patriots,

MoveOn.org will hold rallies July 9 in support of President Obama’s plans for a nationalized health care system.

Read about the group’s plans:

“Dear MoveOn member,

While most Americans took time off to relax this holiday weekend, news broke that insurance companies and special interests have intensified their campaign to destroy health care reform.

They’re now spending more than $1.4 million dollars a day to water down reform and kill President Obama’s public health insurance option.

The only way we can compete with their money and influence is to show so much public support that Republicans and conservative Democrats know they can’t negotiate the public option away behind closed doors.

That’s why this Thursday, July 9, MoveOn members are holding health care rallies at local Senate offices across the country. These rallies are the best way to show that Americans across the country are demanding a strong public health insurance option.

There’s a rally in West Palm Beach this Thursday — can you make it?

Host: Joan G — fellow MoveOn member
Where: Sen. Bill Nelson’s District Office
When: Thursday, July 9 at 12:30 p.m.

Click here to RSVP.

At the rally we’ll hear from local residents affected by the health care crisis and deliver a massive petition in support of President Obama’s public option. Our action will remind Senator Nelson and the media that a strong public health insurance option is the key to real health care reform.

A strong public option would:

  • Save you money. The public health insurance plan will have lower overhead, so it will be more affordable. And the competition will force private insurers to lower their rates and provide better value.
  • Offer you a choice. If you like your current insurance, you can keep it. If not, you can switch to a new public health insurance plan and still receive high-quality care and choose your doctor.
  • Guarantee access to affordable health care. No matter what happens with your job or your health, the public health insurance option will be available to you and your family.

Passing health care reform with President Obama’s public option would be a truly historic achievement that would improve millions of lives across the country. With this much at stake, we just can’t afford to be silent.

Sign up to attend a rally in West Palm Beach.

Thanks again for all you do.

–Nita, Ilya, Stephen, Kat and the rest of the team

Sources:

  1. “Familiar Players in Health Bill Lobbying,” Washington Post, July 6, 2009.
  2. ———————————————————-

 

Treasure Coast, Palm Beach County residents rally against national health care reform and government spending, by Alex Tiegen

WEST PALM BEACH — Barbara Slack and Julia Glattfelt stood outside U.S. Sen. Bill Nelson’s West Palm Beach office Thursday and sang of changes to national health care and political strife.

“They must think the voters are all out to lunch,” the two Port St. Lucie women sang to the tune of the sea chantey, “Blow the Man Down.” “Isn’t it time to throw the bums out?”

A contingent of nine Treasure Coast residents joined a small group of Palm Beach residents at 11 a.m. at Nelson’s office in a rally against proposed national health care reform and government spending.

The South Florida Tea Party group called for locals to gather at the offices of Nelson state representatives, and U.S. Rep. Alcee Hastings, D-Miramar, to protest the Affordable Health Choices Act. Members of two Treasure Coast organizations, Treasure Coast Tea Party and Martin 9/12 Tea Party Committee, participated at Nelson’s office.

Read more …

Tagged with:
 

Daria DiGiovanni, blogger for Palin Drone, attended the July 2 Health Care Freedom Rally in Boca Raton and gave us her account of how she braved the elements with other citizens concerned about the plan for the government takeover of our health care system:

Boca Raton Healthcare Freedom Rally
In spite of the typical South Florida summer downpour, a devoted group of approximately 40 patriots gathered outside Congressman Robert Wexler’s office, located in the Crystal Corporate Center on Military Trail in Boca Raton. Elaine Laffey, my fellow Smart Girl Politics activist and Facebook buddy, did an excellent job coordinating today’s event. I should point out, I was a bit surprised to discover the congressman’s office was located in such an upscale building — you know, the kind that houses all of those eeeevil corporations the Democrats are always harping about.
When we arrived at 3 p.m., there were a scant few people milling about the parking lot, but within minutes, the size of our group nearly quadrupled. As we were preparing to go onto the sidewalk, we noticed a group of socialized medicine/Wexler supporters, all of whom appeared to be senior citizens. When Elaine approached them to say hello and introduce herself, the greeting one gentleman offered in response summed up the difference between the left and the right better than any conservative ever could: “Why are you talking to us? We’re the enemy!” he exclaimed in a caustic tone. Elaine promptly rebutted, “You’re not my enemy, sir. We just have a fundamental disagreement on this issue.”
With that, most of us quietly moved away from them to take our assigned places on the sidewalk, but my friend and die-hard patriot Ellen Snyder stuck around for a while to argue; as expected, her valid points fell on deaf ears. And during the emotionally charged exchange, one guy actually wagged his finger in her face, obnoxiously claiming he was supporting Obamacare “for your child” and erroneously assuming that Ellen, who has worked in the medical industry her entire career, had no idea what she was talking about. Gotta love these tolerant liberals!
Anyway, I suppose Wexler does indeed fancy himself an untouchable CEO, because Elaine and I encountered much resistance when we peacefully approached the building, intent on paying his staff members a friendly visit (Wexler, we were later told, was in Israel) so that they could inform their boss of our strong opposition to nationalized health care.
First, we were stopped by a local cop, a very nice gentleman who gave us his blessing once we explained our purpose (he wanted to make sure we weren’t bringing any signs with us, which would have been a violation).
However, the arrogant building security team was another matter entirely. Three different guards stopped us rather rudely as we made our way to the lobby; undeterred, we kept going, reminding them that Congressman Wexler is a public servant, and thus accountable to his constituents.
By the time we got to the third one, she was poised and ready with a walkie-talkie, presumably to warn Wexler’s staff that two right wing extremists were on their way. In a tone of sheer condescension, she announced, “That is a private office!” Undaunted we replied, “Congressman Wexler works for us, and we have every right to stop by and let him know how we feel about this issue,” before stepping into the glass elevator.
As we ascended to the fourth floor (Suite 490), we watched as the guard then whipped out her walkie talkie and presumably issued an urgent warning to Wexler’s staff. Once inside, we were greeted politely (if somewhat stiffly) but, as directed, wrote out our grievances on the forms provided. Interestingly enough, these forms, which featured the seal of the U.S. Congress at the top, requested a social security number in a line at the bottom, along with the typical information (name, address, etc). Neither of us filled it in.
Back outside, I asked Ellen to contact talk radio host Joyce Kaufman (who was currently broadcasting live) and apprise her of what had just transpired. Although there were several other callers in queue, Ellen’s call was bumped to the front of the line. Once informed, an angry Joyce publicized the incident on the airwaves. By the time Ellen and other protestors paid a visit to the congressman’s office, the phones were ringing off the hook, with solicitious staffers assuring irate callers that of course their office was open to the public! Power to the people, baby.
One other observation: Military Trail is a heavily trafficked street, and this particular intersection is extremely busy. Our friends from the other side stood at an opposite corner, holding up signs in support of Wexler and Obamacare. But as far as I could tell, we were the only ones who received numerous honks of approval, most notably from every trucker who happened to drive by. We even got media coverage from the Sun-Sentinel and the local ABC affiliate (Patrick Laffey, Elaine’s husband, also took video of several of us, including yours truly). I honestly believe most people are starting to wake up and smell the coffee. And that’s a very good thing for America.
Thank you to every patriot who stood out in the rain with us today! Special mention to the 9/12-ers, especially Shannon and Doug and their family; congressional candidate for Congress and Wexler challenger Ed Lynch; the Smart Girl Politics team and once again, to Patrick and Elaine Laffey. This weekend: TEA PARTIES!

Daria DiGiovanni is a freelance writer, blogger, editor and author of the book Water Signs: A Story of Love and Renewal.

FOX NEWS, WASHINGTON — Americans who refuse to buy affordable medical coverage could be hit with fines of more than $1,000 under a health care overhaul bill unveiled Thursday by key Senate Democrats looking to fulfill President Barack Obama’s top domestic priority.

The Congressional Budget Office estimated the fines will raise around $36 billion over 10 years. Senate aides said the penalties would be modeled on the approach taken by Massachusetts, which now imposes a fine of about $1,000 a year on individuals who refuse to get coverage. Under the federal legislation, families would pay higher penalties than individuals.

In a revamped health care system envisioned by lawmakers, people would be required to carry health insurance just like motorists must get auto coverage now. The government would provide subsidies for the poor and many middle-class families, but those who still refuse to sign up would face penalties.

Read more…

Tagged with:
 

By Warner Todd Huston

The Senate is about to pay off the unions for helping get Obama elected. Senator Max Baucus (D, Mont.) looks to be about ready to propose a plan to pay for Obama’s massive, more than $1 trillion in new government spending on healthcare by instituting a new tax on many employees that currently have healthcare through their workplace (nearly 1 in 8 workers according to Peter Barnes). Never having been “income” before, Senator Baucus is prepared to claim it is and will be taxed accordingly.

… unless, of course, you happen to be a union member. If you are a Democrat supporting, Obama voting union member, why you don’t have to pay this never before levied tax at all. You get off scot free. Fuggedaboutit.

So much for equal under the law. Now, all you have to do is join a union and, voila, you don’t have to pay the taxes everyone else suffers under. Aren’t you glad that Obama is so interested in “fair,” and “balanced” governance? Isn’t it great that the Obama era is the “post-partisan” era? If it weren’t the “post-partisan” era, I’d fear for my life instead of just my tax bill this being an example of Democrat’s “fairness” for America.

One of the many problems with Obamacare is his claim that the program could be made “revenue neutral.” It is a thorough fantasy to imagine it could be so. We all know that for Obama to begin to pay for even a small portion of this mess taxes will have to be raised in many areas. And even that will never cover the cost of the trillions that Obama wants to spend on this policy. Obama’s meddling in healthcare will cost an exorbitant amount of money. Worse, it is likely that the states will be left with unfunded mandates that will force them to raise taxes as well (just like what happened with Medicare and Medicaid).

Additionally, Baucus has a sort of bait and switch in his proposal. Not only is he selling this idea to his biggest supporters in unions as a free ride for them in order to get their class warfare vote, but he is also pretending that only “the rich” will have to pay the healthcare-coverage-as-income tax. He says that only a small number of Americans will be hit with the new tax scheme. To soften the blow, Baucus is proposing a cap on on his tax exclusion at a level “significantly above” the cost of current federal employees plans. That way, he claims, the tax would hit only those making $100,000 or above (or $200,000 for a couple). He then proposes that the tax cap be frozen at this current rate. It’s a classic class warfare maneuver. Soak the rich, give everyone else a pass… even though that “everyone else” will ostensibly benefit the most.

So, why would Baucus only want to tax such a small number of people? If his goal is to “pay” for Obama’s massive spending on healthcare, one might think Baucus would make the cap at a much lower income level so that more Americans would find themselves paying the new tax.

This is where it gets underhanded. Once the Baucus cap is frozen at today’s rates, as time goes on and incomes rise, more and more Americans will find themselves suddenly “rich” enough to be taxed unequally. This happened with the “Alternative Minimum Tax.” In that case, only “millionaires” were supposed to be hit harder, but as incomes rose more and more people found themselves forced into the bracket that triggered the tax. The obvious tactic is to hurt fewer Americans now to get the thing passed all the while knowing that more and more citizens will be hit later.

And why exempt all union members? Shouldn’t they share the same burden as other Americans? This is just more of Baucus’ underhanded political games being played with our health. Was Baucus trained by Tony Soprano? It sure seems so.

Tagged with: