TeaPartyWire.com – Tea Party News by and for Tea Party Members

Arpaio schedules another news conference on eligibility

Sheriff Joe Arpaio and his Cold Case Posse investigating Barack Obama’s presidential eligibility have been promising more major revelations since their March 1 press conference, and now another event has been scheduled to unveil new information.
Arpaio told Tea Party Tribune a press conference will be held July 17 at 2:30 p.m. local time at the Maricopa County Sheriff’s Office in Phoenix, Arizona.

WND.com will be live streaming this news conference.
The Tea Party Tribune will also be there covering this breaking news event and have exclusive video and interviews to post. The evidence will include information gathered in the posse’s recent investigative trip to Hawaii as well as an update on the ongoing investigation.

At the March 1 conference, Arpaio and his Cold Case Posse announced there is probable cause that the document released by the White House in April 2011 purporting to be Obama’s original, long-form birth certificate is a forgery. The posse said it also found probable cause that Obama’s Selective Service registration form is fraudulent.
Join with Sheriff Arpaio is his work to uncover the truth by donating to the Cold Case Posse expenses.
WND reported last month that a letter from Hawaii’s Department of Health verifying Obama’s birth in Honolulu has “opened the door” to some “shocking revelations” the posse is promising to disclose.

Among the details leaked early by Cold Case Posse lead investigator Mike Zullo: There are allegedly several stamps bearing Registrar Alvin Onaka’s name “floating around” inside the Hawaii Department of Health.
“I can’t disclose to you what we’ve discovered, but it’s going to be a shocking revelation at our press conference,” Zullo told Tea Party Power Hour host Mark Gillar in a telephone interview from Hawaii.

Sign the petition now to show members of Congress how many Americans demand constitutional integrity.
Three weeks after the March 1 press conference, Arpaio said there was “tons” more potentially shocking information on Obama in connection with his probe into the president’s eligibility.

Zullo has said he and his investigators have reservations about a letter stamped with Onaka’s name that was sent to Arizona Secretary of State Ken Bennett as verification of Obama’s Hawaiian birth.
Zullo said the letter fails to list Obama’s birth date, and it’s merely stamped with the registrar’s name, while another set of initials – not Onaka’s – appears next to the signature.

Does anyone really know where Obama is from? Find out the startling truth from New York Times best-selling author Jerome Corsi.
“From what you’re telling me,” Gillar said, “it sounds like the next press conference is going to be even more amazing than the last press conference back on March 1st.”
“It will be,” Zullo responded. “The information … is going to be breathtaking when it’s released.”

Below is the Cold Case Posse press release video from March 1st, 2012.
This press release was taped by the Tea Party Tribune.

By Doug Book

Weary of defending in court the Constitutional eligibility of their man at 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue, the Democrat Party has finally admitted Barack Obama is not qualified to be president of the United States– and that it doesn’t matter.

According to a motion filed by Party attorneys in a Tennessee eligibility lawsuit, “…Defendants [the Tennessee Democrat Party and the Democrat National Committee] assert that the Tennessee Democrat Party has the right to nominate whoever it chooses to run as a candidate, including someone who is not qualified for the office.”

In numerous previous lawsuits questioning the Constitutional eligibility of Barack Hussein Obama, Democrats have maintained that voters, not the Constitution, should be the final arbiters of presidential eligibility. Though a disgraceful assertion on its face, such mindless rambling was about all that desperate Democrat attorneys had in their arsenals, apart from the perpetually employed “plaintiffs lack standing” defense.

But now, the cat is out of the bag, and the true sentiments of Democrat Party officials have finally been aired. It seems that, according to the left, as long as the acting president has the requisite contempt for the United States, is willing to work tirelessly to destroy the national economy, and will ignore both the rule of law and his Constitutional duty to enforce it, he is eminently qualified to hold the country’s top job.

In February, Georgia Administrative Judge Michael Malihi ignored Supreme Court precedent, made a shambles of case law, and distorted the rulings of other courts in a pathetically obvious mission to find Barack Obama eligible for the Georgia presidential ballot. Although the first judge to decide an Obama eligibility case on the merits, his contempt for an honest judicial process certainly did nothing to mend the rapidly deteriorating reputation of the American legal system.

On Wednesday, United States District Judge S. Thomas Anderson joined a long list of robed colleagues, ruling that plaintiffs in the Tennessee case “lacked standing” to point out Obama’s Constitutional ineligibility for the presidency. That is, plaintiffs could not claim sufficient personal harm should the Manchurian Candidate remain in or be re-elected to the White House.

Strange how the law works. After 3 ½ years of cynical disregard for the borders, language, and culture of the United States, one would think that some 240 million people have suffered “sufficient personal harm” to claim legal standing for a crack at His Royal Highness in a court of law! There are only 30 million illegals currently residing in the United States, and those the Attorney General refers to as “his people” might actually lack legal standing in the eyes of an honest arbiter.

At any rate, Democrats have finally admitted what the rest of us have known for quite some time. Barack Obama is NOT qualified to hold the job won for him by the national media in 2008. But it seems only the voters will have the authority to reclaim it from him. God willing, the vast majority who exercise that authority in November will be both American and alive.

Source: Impeach Obama Campaign.com

A Citizenship Primer & Presidential Eligibility

By: Adrien Nash

Citizenship is basically a simple thing. People have membership in groups and nations by either of 2 options.
These options can be stated various ways.
Version 1. One is either a member by natural law, or one is a member by human law.
Version 2. One is either a member by right of inheritance, or one is a member by grant.
Version 3. One is either a member by birth to members, or by permission of members.

Membership by permission includes automatic membership at birth if certain conditions are met.
Those who are members by permission, by law, fall into four categories, which are:
1. Membership by naturalization, -through the process of renouncing their previous foreign membership.
2. Membership by association, -foreign-born children gain citizenship when parents naturalize.
3. Membership at birth, -granted to children born within the group’s territory to legal unnaturalized immigrants.
4. Membership for those born abroad to parents of mixed and various types, members and non-members alike.

There’s another category that seems like a fifth category but is not because membership is not by permission but by right. It is: membership by birth, -for children born into the group by naturalized parents. Their parents became members by law, but they’re members by right,-via birth to those who officially became new members.

Most individuals, perhaps 99%, are members by the principle of natural law, following the pattern of nature. In nature it doesn’t matter where a creature is born. What matters is to whom they are born. Creatures reproduce their own kind. Eagles produce eagles. Their off-spring are eagles by natural inheritance. Similarly, members produce members. Their off-spring are members by natural association, -inheriting their parents membership. They are natural members. All other members are members by permission of the group.
Citizenship by Birth vs Citizenship at Birth
All who are members by birth were also automatically members at birth, but not all who were members at birth are also members by birth since one or both of their parents were not members. For membership to be conferred at birth, the conditions are simple;
Born within the group’s territory to parents who are subject to the authority that governs the group.
When outsiders are subject to the group authority, that’s taken to be evidence that the outsiders have chosen to join the group. The group may therefore grant membership to their children, but not to them, -unless they are purified of their membership in their natural group, (-a membership which their children never experienced) and swear loyalty to the group they wish to join. After becoming members, any children born to them are natural members, but they themselves will never be natural members because they were not born to members.

Non-natural situations require membership to be by the permission of members, -by human law, by decree.
The typical non-natural situation is birth to a father who is not a member but merely a visitor. His off-spring is not a natural member because the principles of natural law and right of inheritance are not applicable. Therefore his off-spring requires permission to be a member even if that permission begins at birth through their connection to a mother who’s a member. (This was not always allowed, but became law in 1922 when the citizenship of mothers was allowed to be passed to their children born of foreign fathers who were absent.)

Barack Obama did not inherit membership from either his mother or his father but instead was born in the non-natural-situation category, and therefore was not a natural member. Rather, he was dependent on permission to be a member. That permission was via his link to his mother, but not through his father since he was merely a visitor). His membership began at birth and was derived from Immigration statutes dealing with American women who marry foreign men.
Such members are equal to all other members except in one regard. No one who is not a natural member, but is a member solely by permission or decree, is permitted to ever be Chief. No non-natural member is to ever wield the power and authority of the very top level of leadership.”NO person, except a natural born Member, shall be eligible to the Office of the Chief” (see the Membership Constitution, Article II, Section 1, paragraph5.

http://h2ooflife.wordpress.com
(aka http://obama–nation.com)