TeaPartyWire.com – Tea Party News by and for Tea Party Members

By Dr. Phil Taverna

I ran across this book in my travels. And it peaked my interest. Who was the Forgotten Man? According to Amity Shlaes, her book, The Forgotten Man  is someone that will peak your interest for sure.

When I first saw the expression, I expected to see a book written by a commie liberal and it was about the plight of the blacks and minorities who can’t seem to get a fair share no matter how much money we throw at them.

This book is mainly about FDR the biggest commie of the 40’s but it also gives you an economical look at Hoover and Coolidge. These were the folks at the helm when we were hit with the first and only big recession. Some would argue that Obama was at the helm for the second big recession, but let’s face it, today there are so many safety nets out there, that it is really difficult to call this a recession. I remember stories about my uncles going to the harbor near Staten Island snagging drift wood out of the river so they could heat their house. Today you go down to the local government office and you get wads of cash and plastic and cell phones to make sure you never go hungry. And if that doesn’t work for you, commit a crime and you get three squares plus each and every day.

But the term Forgotten Man as it was originally intended was quite simple. Basically you have people from 2 groups. One of the folks comes up with a great idea and they convince the 2^nd group to vote for the great idea. And the third group the Forgotten Man gets to pay for it and he has no say in the matter. In the end the Forgotten Man gets screwed over and over again and he derives no real benefit from what he is paying for.

FDR tried to make the Forgotten Man the person receiving the goodies. Just like every liberal that came after him. There is an uncanny similarity between the stupid polices of FDR and those of Obama. One aspect I will never understand is why we keep voting in folks that rely on liberal wackos to micromanage our economy.

The only thing that saved FDR was probably social security. The people were stupid to elect FDR to a second term based on social security. Just like Obamacare it was something that the voter would not benefit from until the next term of the president.  And it was promised that SS would never go up and the most you would pay would be 3% of $3,000 annually. We have come a long way baby. And one of my beefs about SS is that if it was used solely for pensioners there would be more money there then we would ever need. But since they use it for any liberal policy under the sun, it will be bankrupted and under utilized compared to what it was actually promised to accomplish.

FDR’s opponent Wendell Willkie, the Romney of the day, stated that SS should only be used for pensioners. So you can see that it did not evolve with time as this albatross around all American businesses and workers. Right from the beginning, FDR saw this was a way to tax people without them knowing about it, and spending it on his commie liberal projects.

Most of FDR’s policies were failures. It was the war that turned it around. It was not actually the war that did it; it was the fact that the factories were being retooled to supply materials to our allies to fight the war.

This is a clear and basic principle that all presidents should have tattooed on their foreheads. You have to assume Obama looks in the mirror constantly while singing to himself about how great he is. But the bottom line is you need jobs in this country. Idiot Clinton thought he could build an economy by shipping American jobs to other countries. Clinton may have become rich in the process, but most people don’t realize or don’t want to remember but Clinton’s economy tanked in his last year in office. And under the Obama doctrine, President Bush’s fiscal year did not begin until he was in office for a full year.

Clinton and Obama have no clue how many private sector jobs are needed to make this country work. In my book I discuss the dependency of government jobs on the revenue created by the private sector. And Clinton and Obama as well as FDR went out of their way to destroy the private sector.

Couple of things that Hoover and FDR believed in, was to raise prices. This is quite amusing; they imagined that if they could get all the prices to go up, then that would fix the economy. And this is great if some how every dollar that was used to increase the price could funnel its way down to the consumer and then the economy would flourish at least imaginarily. But this policy fell short, because it was impossible for the commies to raise all the prices.

Then FDR embarked on raising salaries. Thinking like a true commie or a union man this killed the economy as well. This is econ 101. If you raise salaries and can’t raise profits, it won’t be long before the company moves to China or Mexico. Unionization may be a good idea, but economically it is a failure. Have you ever heard of a union tying in a bonus or pay raise or reduction with the amount of profit they create? Tell that to the teacher’s union. Heck they don’t want testing or vouchers. Who needs a profit? You would think the profit would be earned by the revenue created by the students that they deliver to help the economy. All you seem to hear from the group of FDR socialists are demands to give them more benefits and money no matter what they produce. The unions claim: If the parents can’t teach them at home, what do you expect us to do in the classroom? But please keep paying the teachers!

Then FDR came up with the grand winner of them all. It was called the Undistributed Profits Tax. This proves without a doubt that FDR was ignorant and a communist. This is similar to the death tax and the cap and trade tax we see coming from Commie Obama today. Back then someone whispered in FDR’s good ear and told him businesses weren’t spending their profits. How dare they! This was hurting the economy. So the idiot president taxes again the money not spent by the businesses. To make things more interesting he wanted to tax the rich. Where do we find idiot presidents like this? They are called liberal, progressive communists. And most of your Democrats swear and believe in this nonsense.

In other words if the economy isn’t good and the tax revenues are down, the best way to encourage more businesses in America is to Tax them more! Isn’t this what idiot Obama tells us each and every day? But Obama puts a new spin to the made up Forgotten Man or Woman. It is only fair that women make more money. Fair is one of those unquantifiable and unqualified terms. But if I was president, I would want more jobs out there so that people could pick and choose where they want to go. If you produce results like Obama, you deserve to lose your job. If you don’t think you are making enough money in the marketplace, then go get another job.

You see, under the Obama economy, he would rather see your job go to illegal immigrants. Think about it, if Obama can only produce 60,000 jobs a month, then when the 800,000 (1.2 mil) illegal immigrants join that market this month, who gets the job? Does the illegal immigrant on welfare, or the Forgotten Man or Woman get the job?

It is only fair that the job goes to the person who will work for less!

As you go back through the decades and look at the misguided policies of presidents like FDR, Hoover, Clinton, and Obama to name a few,  I keep asking the same question, if a person never created a job in his life like Obama, then how can you expect him to create jobs for the Forgotten Man.

But you can count on one thing, these liberals will make sure as they bombard us with their useless and costly programs like Obamacare, they won’t be paying for it, you the Forgotten Men and Women will pay for it.

If you know how to play the system, you will never be the Forgotten Person. Isn’t it time that we elect folks that keep their hands out of your pocket for the sake of someone’s imaginary needs?

If you have the time to seek out a copy of The Forgotten Man. I have heard for a long time how FDR was this great president like Clinton. After reading Amity’s book, you just might come away with the fact that it was only the liberal policies of the elected that have bought us to this new Amityville horror. It is time to send the liberals to other countries that appreciate liberal, deficit creating policies! Then they will look to others to bail out their economy. Like Obama it is always easier to blame everyone else then to (Wo)Man up and just start creating private sector jobs!

 It is time to get the liberals out of the way of our prosperity!

YourDemocracyChange.Com

 Can We Learn from Killing Lincoln, or Is it Too Late to Fix their Mistakes?

By Dr Phil Taverna

Killing Lincoln by Bill O’Reilly is a great book. I think it is inspiring to read history books that are written in the first or second person. Gingrich has written several books like this, but keep in mind these books are fiction and speculative at best. But I think it is a great way to learn about history with this genre or type of writing. It places you at the scene of the killing of Lincoln and Booth. At the end of the day you may not remember all the names, but you will remember a few basic points. Lincoln was shot a few days after General Lee surrendered to General Grant. And Booth was probably nuts fed by the money from the confederates. There are numerous conspiracy theories you can delve into but think about the stupidity of Lincoln and the waste that can be summed up by the words: The Civil War.

The first part of O’Reilly’s book brings you to the massacre of soldiers for the sake of ending the war. Keep in mind there were over 600,000 deaths and over a million casualties.  And was all that destruction of property and life worth it to free 4 million slaves in the 1860’s? 40,000 Black soldiers died in the course of the war. (Total U.S. Population 31.5 million)

Lincoln gets the label as the number one president, but would that be so if he was not assassinated? Clearly George Washington should easily be number one but since he had the audacity to own slaves he is pretty much underrated. But Washington was a General and lead armies. He was a great statesman and it could be argued if not for Washington, we may not have the country that we have today.

The book clearly points out time and time again that Lincoln was a jerk. He had numerous death threats. The war was technically over. And he is out riding about Washington with little or no protection. He could have been or should have been protected by an entire Calvary Unit. Instead on that fatal night he was protected by a drunk who went AWOL to have a drink or two. Lincoln had ample resources at his disposal to protect him. This is similar to Obama passing Obamacare. We all know it won’t work, but Skippy thinks if he saddles the nation with this albatross it will all be worked out in the next decade or so. Long after Obama is gone.

We can only conclude that Lincoln fully did not understand the importance of his office. And on the personal level did he realize how difficult it would be for his family if he was assassinated. It would only seem selfish on Lincoln’s part not to defend and protect the Office of the President of the United States.

And all he had to do was ask and he would have been totally protected and the tragedy that occurred on Good Friday over a hundred years ago would have been avoided. Lincoln was of the notion that the South would not be punished for their part in the Civil War. He felt it was time for healing. By allowing the president to be shot, the south lost their biggest advocate in the Whitehouse and maybe all of Washington.

Another weird fact that came from the book was the big surrender scene. Sloppy Grant and pristine Lee played the main rolls.  And Lee appeared to be shocked and grateful that no repercussions would come from the surrender. Basically go home and quit fighting. My question is if Grant and Lincoln knew this years before, why not offer the surrender earlier then they did. In doing so, they may have saved the City of Richmond and hundreds of thousands of lives.

If Lincoln was this great president, then why didn’t he avoid the war? Anyone can start a war; it’s the great men that can prevent the carnage. The south’s economy for a very large part was based on slavery. It was their commerce and their prosperity. What do you do with 4 million freed slaves? The south had no use for them. The North wasn’t sending for them to fill their cities and factories. It would seem it would have been a lot easier to end slavery without causing a Civil War.

Let’s imagine one being a plantation owner with a 1,000 slaves. For decades you have paid to feed them, cloth them and shelter them. You have paid to have a doctor look after them. And because of these slaves, as a plantation owner you make a pretty good living. And don’t get hung up on the societal end of things and bad slave owners, think about logistics. So basically once you free the slaves this plantation owner is broke. All the money that was invested in his army of slaves was lost. Similar to all the foreclosures we have had under Obama. One day you own a house that is valuable. The next day because of banks and government rulings, you have nothing. Matter of fact you are actually a slave to the debt and credit rating that may be left over after the foreclosure proceedings.

Of course with this type of punishment, why wouldn’t the south fight back to keep their commerce. I also think that if the South could look into a crystal ball before the first shot was fired, they may have made different decisions. But in the end they felt they were fighting for their constitutional rights that were being taken away by the likes of Lincoln and his band of thieves.

If they had a crystal ball, would they have been more open to compromise. Technology would eventually put an end to slavery in a decade or so, so why subject the nation to the massacres and mayhem?

What if the compromise was to pay the slaves a small amount of money and give them full power to vote? At that time it would only be the male slaves who were not illiterate. What if the parties agreed to raise this amount as salary over time? I would imagine that this may be the first inkling of or the start of unions. Technically the slaves would no longer be slaves. They would have money and a vote. And they could stay put where they are fed, clothed and sheltered.  Why not have capitalism pay for their upkeep instead of the taxpayer?

And as this money reached a certain level, essentially the slaves per se would be free. They could buy their own freedom, rather then be given Welfare and shackles with another form of slavery. All forms of government are essentially slavery. It is the purpose of a true democracy not a republic to make the rules and laws acceptable and ratified by the majority of the people not a select few.

It is like programming a computer. It is always easy to write script to change a part of the program. The hard part is to examine the entire program to see where this change will have an ill effect. The same holds true with political laws that are passed. The liberals don’t seem to take to heart or to the wallet what changes these laws will have on our economy and freedom.

NAFTA, EPA and Obamacare are useless legislation’s that look good to a few but in the end these legislation’s take on a life of their own and bring down not only freedom, but the entire economy. Which in the end, it will be just like Lincoln freeing the slaves.  $15 trillion dollars later and we still have the same poverty numbers and a whole lot of national debt! The liberals may mean well, but they are too stupid to cause real and prosperous change.

Some will argue if Lincoln was not shot then he would be executed at some point. If he was protected, it would have taken an obvious inside conspiracy to kill the president. As it was, it was only a lone gunman near a grassy mall.

These are my thoughts and opinions. Take the time to read this great book. Children can read the book. A lot of money that O’Reilly makes goes to charities. He would rather give to charity then to pay taxes. So take the time and read about history.

And take the time to think about what if. And then take the time to think about Obama. What if Obama did not pass Obamacare? What if Obama did not waste all that money on stimulus spending?  Remember a great deal of the TARP money that was charged to President Bush was returned with interest. What did Obama do with that money? What if Obama stopped spending money in 2009? What if Obama freed the mortgage industry from the greed of politicians and bankers and Wall Street?

What would the economy look like today?

It is easy to pass laws. It seems hard as hell to take responsibility for them. We have come a long way, it is amazing to think that the children of the president are descendants of slaves and slave owners. It is time for the liberals to get out of the way so the shackles of intrusive government can be removed forever so that capitalism can bring freedom and fairness. Wouldn’t you want to be free to make choices rather then be strapped to the rules and regulations created by liberal progressives? Please, Don’t let history repeat itself, over and over!

YourDemocracyChange.Com

By Dr Phil Taverna

Mark Levin has put together a great book entitled Ameritopia. He takes you on a trip about utopia and what the founders had in mind for America. The real question is can you really have freedom and liberty under utopia? But more importantly we need to discuss: Is socialism or Obama’s communism really utopia?

Levin discusses a few utopian beliefs. They come from folks like Plato, More, Hobbes, and Marx. Something strikes me as quite odd about all this nonsense. All these clowns were philosophers and writers but what did they really know about the common man. Or were they looking for a means to make a select few rich and to corral the masses to think happy thoughts and obey their rules.

I always thought that utopia would never work. The problem is that you needed to get the masses to work together for a common cause with some means to be equal. Most of you might already have heard that the Pilgrims tried this crap and they almost starved to death.

And there were some successes in small group when a business was centered on utopia. And they had great leaders/rabble-rousers and a product that created a profit. But one thing that seems to smack you in the face is the concept of replacing a monarch or a dictatorship. But in all the experimental models it seems that the middle class was too stupid to rule themselves and that they needed a monarch or a group of men to make the rules to keep them in line. And no matter how hard they tried to imagine the ruling class as bribe free, they never really could achieve equality among the middle class. And no way, and no how could equality be created among all men under a utopian government.

So Levin paints this jump to make Obama’s communism as this quest for equality as a quest for Utopia. Thus ultimately Obama and his liberal friends are trying to achieve Ameritopia as their utopian society for Americans. And we all know that equality can never happen. If we could only achieve fairness on all counts I think we all could be happy. Equality is a pretty stupid concept. It is a subjective reasoning experiment, and generally the liberals see equality as the redistribution of rights, money and freedom as a form of equality. They are dreaming and it is about time they wake up to the fact that fairness and equality can be achieved but it must come from within and not from the ruling class. In other words the middle class must rise up and take back the reins of freedom. The liberal’s equality is only meant to harness the masses for the benefit of a few. There is little chance for freedom or liberty.

Folks like Levin work real hard to put together an argument as to why tyranny is based on this utopia or more to the point to the fact that we are no longer following the intent of the constitution. But let’s face it, you can write about it until the cows come home, but will the exercise of writing about the constitution have any more of a benefit then the liberals experimenting with their redistribution policies in the name of equality.

In other words we need a plan to fix the problem. The problem is simple; people like Obama have this dream that equality can only be obtained by screwing just about everyone in the process by having enough rules so that all people are equal. That is, all would be equal only to those who the rules apply.

On the other hand the capitalist/conservatives should vacate this foolish constitutional argument for the sake of equality. Equality per se can never be obtained. But fairness can be obtained. Will it be perfect, absolutely not! But at least everyone will have a chance to obtain their choice of life. As it stands today, the liberals think it is fair if they cause the price of gasoline to go up to five dollars a gallon. Granted a few will make a ton of money, but for most it will cause pain and it will cause a great deal of inflation. This is something that would be suicidal in Obama’s poor economy.

If Levin wants millions of people to understand his book, then he should write it at a 5^th grade reading level. Or better yet, make a story about it. If he wrote his book for the benefit of constitutional law folks with the notion to persuade them to give up their liberal persuasion, he probably came up short on his goals.

Unless we can eliminate the liberal judges that sit on our courts, there is little chance of any book on constitutional law alone making a difference for the cause of Freedom and Fairness.

And just like the deficit, tyranny is not something that fits in the wheelhouse of most Americans. Most of us are free to buy guns, vote, go to work, marry, die and pay taxes. What else could you possibly ask for? The bottom line is that most Americans feel that wackos like Obama will take these rights away!

But there is something for most to ponder that is a fundamental difference between Obama’s communism and George Washington’s freedom. The commies believe in communal justice. That means that all justice and administration as such is for the good of the community. For example in most of utopia, once you are no longer a benefit to society, then it is time for you to die. Keep that in mind when a liberal sits on an Obama Healthcare death squad and they determine whether you get treatment or die. The question they will answer is the money spent on your treatment good for society. If it is only good for you, then it will be deemed that it is not good for society… It will be a burden!

And for some reason, commies like the Russians closed 70,000 churches in its heyday. So why are the liberals against your freedom of religion?

In Constitutional freedom, each and every citizen, not illegal immigrants, benefit from individual justice. You know like the best interest of the child. Under Obama, it would be under the best interest of the community as to how your child will have justice served.

If you get a chance to read Ameritopia, the Unmaking of America, please do. I am sure you will have a better understanding of what the ultimate goal Obama has for this country. And it doesn’t take a rocket scientist to know that at anytime in history utopia has never worked. Maybe you will be the one to come up with a plan to fix the problem after you read the book.

The more people that understand that this is Obama’s plan, the more people will understand that this unconscionable behavior by Obama will be his Waterloo.

YourDemocracyChange.Com

Obama Report Card: Betcha they Wish they had Another Democrat to Run!

By Dr. Phil Taverna

Let’s keep this simple. Since the liberals want to have class wars, gender wars and race wars then let’s start with women. The Obama’s Truth team sends out a couple of women to lie for Obama. And because they are women, then all women must believe the rhetoric as gospel truth.

This tidbit leaked out this week. Obama’s Whitehouse pays the men on average (Median) about $11,000 per year more than the female workers. My bet is that there are probably more women as well. There has been no reporting of the racial divide or discrepancies in salaries in regard to race.  So what’s up?

How come women in the Obama Whitehouse are not paid the same amount as men?

Liberals always imagine this fair world where everyone will receive the same pay check for the same amount of energy expended except for Mrs. Romney. The problem is who gets to determine if the energy expended is the same!

The median salary for women in the Whitehouse was $60,000. So a difference of $11,000 bucks is quite a lot in a commie Whitehouse. That’s almost a 20% differential and what about the benefits and lifetime benefits?

You might recall in tennis the women made a stink about equal pay. Even though men play longer matches, it didn’t matter; the women demanded that the pay be the same. Usually men have to play from 3 to 5 sets. Women generally play only 2 and max out at 3. Way back then the men usually had more exciting matches. Today, we hear the players pant with this loud voice like they just got shot in the butt by a pellet gun. And the women wear jewelry and look pretty for the camera. So maybe the women should be paid more. The question really should be who makes more money for the tennis broadcasts?

For liberals it doesn’t matter, for the sake of capitalism, it does matter.

Back to the Whitehouse, we have to give Obama an “F” here. He has been trying to play the gender card for years and he can’t keep his own house in order. They will claim that it was caused by the “Bush” rules they have to follow. Obama has scribbled out left handed more executive orders than anyone. I am sure it would have been nothing to throw all the female employees in the same provision that paid all his czars a 6 figure salary. Better luck next time… Whoops there probably won’t be a next time!

The military is not too happy with King Obama. His approval rating has fallen to an all time low of 25%. And he has a disapproval of 44%. There are videos on the internet showing President Bush being cheered by the military, but not for lefty Obama. President Bush won the war in Iraq and Obama does nothing but shackle members of the military with charges and Obama is losing the war in Afghanistan. It was Biden and Obama who said they would win the war in Afghanistan. And do you remember they said it was the “right” war.

They should have high tailed it out of there once the swearing in ceremony was over. Without waterboarding they are like sitting ducks. Imagine trying to negotiate with the Taliban terrorists while you have set a firm date of withdrawal.

Obama’s handling of foreign policy is a “D-“. Thanks to President Bush’s intel begotten by evil weatherboarding, our troops were able to track down Bin Laden. Who at the time was no longer a strong leader of Al Qaeda.  He was nothing but a coward hiding from the military in the country of our “good” ally.

Obama must realize that the American economy that he and the liberals helped to destroy is not going too well. Alright, it is pretty dismal. Obama has lost millions of jobs and it is so bad that there are millions who have giving up trying. The problem is that Obama gallivants all over the world on a daily basis. And Lady Obama does the same. It has been noted that Obama never spends 2 consecutive days in the Whitehouse and if he flies somewhere, he usually returns to the Whitehouse by the evening.

This costs the taxpayer billions of dollars. And since most of his flying time has to do with fund raising, shouldn’t the Democrats and Obama have to pay for the expense of Obama to campaign and fund raise.

The Public and the voters notice this extraordinary expense. With today’s technology, he could stay home and show up digitally anywhere in the world. Obama has been saying the same thing for years; they could just make one copy and replay it all over the world as many times as they can as the campaign money keeps rolling in.

He is doing such a lousy job with the economy, we really don’t need to pay him to go to Solyndra or GM to brag about electric cars that don’t sell and solar panels that are obsolete.

So Obama gets another “F” for his ability to at least give the impression that he is concerned about the deficit which he has caused to double in less then 4 years. Obama believes that he has this God or Allah given right that he can spend any amount of money on travel anywhere in the world.

The voters will remember this insensitivity (insanity) in November. It is important that Obama and his family are grounded by January 2013. If the Democrats want to fly him all over the place, let them fork up the cash! Let the real truth be known by November!

YourDemocracyChange.Com

Martin vs. Zimmerman: Black Power or Justice Gone Haywire?

By Dr. Phil Taverna

The liberal media has gone wild on this one, it must be spring break. And it is a tragedy for both families but we seem to be missing a few key elements to the problem.

We had a community plague with robberies. And we had a bunch of racists who want to blow this way out of proportion.

And most importantly when anyone dies, it is a tragedy. But in most cases, something stupid or a sequence of stupidity needs to precede needless death. And it really shouldn’t matter if the dead victim is white, black or the color of a rainbow. And for the live victim if we truly live in a free and fair society it should not matter what color or religion he wears as a coat.

Problem number one was the number of robberies. Does this neighborhood need to be protected? If they had such an exorbitant number of robberies, why didn’t the State, Feds and locals place more police in this neighborhood? They are going to say because of the Obama economy and the Democrats plot to destroy the real estate values in Florida, they had to make cuts. That doesn’t sound right to me, but that is life or death sometimes.

Now once this community decided to defend themselves with a neighborhood watch group, well crap could happen. And in this case, it did. Wouldn’t it be better if they put a sign up that stated that this neighborhood has a neighborhood watch system. Each and every homeowner is licensed to have a firearm, and if you enter any of these homes in the community to do harm, you will probably be shot, enter at your own peril! That would have probably solved the problem without Martin having to pay the ultimate price.

The other problem is the attitude of many Black folks. They use words like slavery, profiling, racism and hate. And of course they use it for political purposes and gain and to gain trillions of dollars in aid. And if the White folks are stupid enough to give the money to Blacks then why not keep acting the same way.

But the problem is what does this do to the people growing up as Blacks. You have heard remarks made by Lady Obama and Barack and these folks have never seen a day of prejudice, they learned how to play the system and they played it to the hilt.

I remember when I was about Martin’s age; my father told me a story. My dad’s folks both came from Corleone. And he had an Italian gal probably American born like him on the back of his motorcycle. And he told her he was Sicilian; she jumped off the back of the motorcycle while it was still going. And he actually had a few prospective customers slam the door in his face or kick him out of their house because he was Sicilian. I don’t know why my father told me these stories. I am a pretty optimistic person and never kept this type of prejudice in my heart. But I am sure somewhere along the line, I was probably prejudiced because I had an Italian sounding name, even though I was 50 % Polish and 100% 2nd generation legal American.

But imagine what it must be like to be born Black and to hear this crap each and every day. So every time that something does not go your way you automatically get angry and think it is because you are Black. The teacher gives you a poor grade… It’s because you are Black. The person in the store refuses to take something back… It’s because you are Black.

Could you imagine living like that? If Martin was raised that way, he might have thought that Zimmerman was questioning him because he was Black.  Martin was probably filled with rage because he thought Zimmerman was 100% white. But the real reason he was being questioned was because he was a stranger in a neighborhood that has been bombarded by robberies. And Zimmerman was hired so to speak to watch the neighborhood. It was his duty to ask Martin what he was doing in his neighborhood.

And it is reasonable to conclude that Martin being Black and raised Black was offended. It ended up with Martin allegedly being on top of Zimmerman causing injuries to his head. I have seen photos of Martin and he appears that he could easily weigh 180 pounds. But let’s say he was only 160. In the movies Bruce Willis can flick a guy off him with his pinkie. But in real life when someone that size and strength is sitting on you smashing your head; you are probably not going to get him off you with or without your pinkie. And Zimmerman defended his life by allegedly shooting Martin.

I am sure if Zimmerman could do this over he may have shot him in the leg as he approached him assuming that Martin did not sneak up behind him. But I do not fault Martin, I fault all the Blacks and liberals like Obama that have fed Martin all this Black propaganda since child birth. It was the bearers of this propaganda that took Martin’s life, not a bullet that came from the gun.

I personally can imagine the rage that can fill a person that hears this crap day in and day out. And the Black Panthers should be arrested again for their threats that they made on camera. And Spike Lee another champion of Black rights should be arrested as well. These are the people that hate white folks and continue to breed hate among the Blacks.

America just can’t do much more for the Blacks. They have just about bankrupted the country. People don’t hate Obama because he is Black. They hate or despise him because he is a bloomin liberal and he has no clue how to fix the economy. When he uses words like tolerant and activism, he has clearly captured the gold medal title as the worse president we have ever had. And have you ever heard once, just once an apology as to why and what he screwed up. Now that’s a real leader. But it is always someone else’s fault for Obama. It won’t be long before the press blames Obama’s poor poll numbers on racists.

Obama lives in his own make-believe world. And unfortunately because of this racial rhetoric Martin and others like him have to pay the price. It would be a great day in America when the so called minorities stop looking for handouts and start living the real capitalistic dream, not the make-believe failing socialistic dreams of folks like Obama.

And maybe then a child like Martin will act like a real citizen and not like someone profiled. Everyone has a right to protect their person and their neighborhood. We used to have a constitution that allowed that.

It wasn’t too long ago that there was a national election held in Florida. The State said President Bush won. It was clear and obvious. After the liberals caused the spending of millions of dollars, it still came out that President Bush won.

This Martin case was investigated for 5 hours by the authorities and it was found to be no wrong doing. The liberals again want to spend millions and in the end will come to the original conclusion.

The fault lies dear Brutus on the liberals and the Blacks that keep spewing this rhetoric that is hurting their people. I promise you that if you grow up and come down to our level, that the American Sun will shine brighter and more prosperous then ever. Try it, you just might like it!

One final thought, some folks think it is ok to charge Zimmerman and let justice run its course. It has always been constitutionally believed, that you were innocent until proven guilty. That means the prosecutor has to have some kind of credible evidence and that she can win the case in good faith. It is not just a matter of the defendant spending hundreds of thousands of dollars to be part of a legal experiment.

It would be great if we could turn the clocks back and set up a camera crew to film the tragedy. But if you end up on top of someone beating their head to the ground, there is always a risk that something can go horribly wrong. Just because Martin was only 17 does not exonerate his actions and the tragedy. Sometimes you are the windshield and sometimes you are the bug!

YourDemocracyChange.Com