You are browsing the archive for department of justice.

BREAKING– Judge Refuses To Block Florida Voter Purge

3:27 pm in 2012 elections, department of justice, doj, Headlines, Hinkle, voter fraud by becca.lower

AP Photo

By GARY FINEOUT
AP
June 27, 2012

TALLAHASSEE, Fla. — A federal judge has refused to stop Florida from removing potentially non-U.S. citizens from its rolls.

The U.S. Department of Justice sued the state to halt the purge, arguing it was going on too close to a federal election.

U.S. District Judge Robert Hinkle said Wednesday that there was nothing in federal voting laws that prevent the state from identifying non-U.S. citizens even if it comes less than 90 days before the Aug. 14 election.

Hinkle ruled that federal laws are designed to block states from removing eligible voters close to an election. He said they are not designed to stop states from blocking voters who should have never been allowed to cast ballots in the first place.

Gov. Rick Scott praised Hinkle’s decision, saying “irreparable harm will result if non-citizens are allowed to vote.”

Read more at the Huffington Post

BREAKING– House Republicans release final Holder contempt resolution

7:51 pm in ATTORNEY GENERAL ERIC HOLDER, contempt of congress, department of justice, doj, executive privilege, Headlines, House of Representatives, Operation Fast and Furious, subpoena, Trey Gowdy by becca.lower

Rep. Trey Gowdy, R-S.C., center, with Rep. Dennis Ross, R-Fla., left, waves notes and papers as he calls for the release of additional Justice Department documents as the House Oversight and Government Reform Committee considers whether to hold Attorney General Eric Holder in contempt of Congress. (Photo: J. Scott Applewhite/AP)

By Pete Kasperowicz
The Hill- “Floor Action”

Republicans late Friday released the final version of the resolution asserting that Attorney General Eric Holder is in contempt of Congress for refusing to hand over documents related to the Fast and Furious gun-walking operation.

The crux of the resolution is just three paragraphs:

“Resolved, That Eric H. Holder, Jr., Attorney General of the United States, shall be found to be in contempt of Congress for failure to comply with a congressional subpoena.

“Resolved, That pursuant to 2 U.S.C. 192 and 194, the Speaker of the House of Representatives shall certify the report of the Committee on Oversight and Government Reform, detailing the refusal of Eric H. Holder, Jr., Attorney General, U.S. Department of Justice, to produce documents to the Committee on Oversight and Government Reform as directed by subpoena, to the United States Attorney for the District of Columbia, to the end that Mr. Holder be proceeded against in the manner and form provided by law.

“Resolved, That the Speaker of the House shall otherwise take all appropriate action to enforce the subpoena.”

Republicans have said the resolution may be brought up next week, depending on whether Holder delivers the subpoenaed documents requested by Republicans. If it is brought up for a vote, it appears likely that it would come up Tuesday at the earliest.

Read more: The Hill

Holder retracts claim Bush team knew about Fast and Furious

6:13 pm in ATTORNEY GENERAL ERIC HOLDER, Chuck Grassley, department of justice, doj, Fast and Furious, Headlines, Michael Mukasey, Operation Fast and Furious, retraction by becca.lower

by Paul Bedard
“Washington Secrets”
The Washington Examiner

In a second major retraction over its version of the the gun-walking scandal, the Justice Department has retracted Attorney General Eric Holder’s charge in a hearing last week that his Bush administration predecessor had been briefed on the affair.

In a memo just released by Sen. Chuck Grassley, the Iowa senator reveals that Holder also didn’t apologize to former Attorney General Michael Mukasey for dragging him into the Fast & Furious scandal that is headed for a major legal clash and likely contempt of Congress charge against Holder.

According to Grassley’s memo, Justice said that Holder “inadvertently” made the charge against Mukasey in a hearing.

Read more: The Washington Examiner

Breaking– Justice Dept. Goes After Sheriff Joe Arpaio for Alleged Racial Profiling

11:57 am in allegations, arpaio, Associated Press, AZ News, Border/Immigration, Cheriff Arpaio, Civil Rights, civil rights violations, cns news, department of justice, doj, federal authorities, Immigration, Justice Department, justice dept, policy decision, Sheriff Joe Arpaio, traffic stops by becca.lower

Maricopa County (Arizona) Sheriff Joe Arpaio (AP Photo)

By WALTER BERRY, Associated Press
CNS News.com
May 10, 2012

PHOENIX (AP) – Federal authorities have said they plan to sue Arizona sheriff Joe Arpaio and his office over allegations of civil rights violations, including the racial profiling of Latinos.

The U.S. Justice Department has been seeking an agreement requiring Arpaio’s office to train officers in how to make constitutional traffic stops, collect data on people arrested in traffic stops and reach out to Latinos to assure them that the department is there to also protect them.

Arpaio has denied the racial profiling allegations and has claimed that allowing a court monitor would mean that every policy decision would have to be cleared through an observer and would nullify his authority.

To read more, please visit: CNSNews.com

Identification: It’s Good For Everything Except Voting

9:33 pm in comby, constitutional right, department of justice, Eric Holder, minority votes, photo id, redress of grievances, s scott, scott ott, undercover investigation, Vote Fraud by PinkTeaPatriot

Source: PowerLineBlog.com

By: John Hinderaker

Posted: April 6th, 2012

PJTV’s Scott Ott carries out an entertaining undercover investigation: he goes to the offices of several groups that denounce voter identification laws as unconstitutional suppression of minority votes, etc., and tries to get in to see someone. Sure enough: they all require identification, including the Department of Justice, which has sued to invalidate voter identification laws. You have a constitutional right to petition for redress of grievances, but if you want to see Eric Holder or anyone else at the the Department of Justice to explain your grievance, you need a photo ID.

Source: PowerLineBlog.com