OK, so I am watching a CNN panel discussion about Romney’s acceptance speech. Christine O’Donnell was on the panel. The CNN host said that Romney’s speech and our side was, in essence, calling the Democrats communist. O’Donnell explained that we are not calling them communist, but simply pointing out the differences in our vision of America verses the Democrats. Once again, an Obama media operative was attempting to spin/distort our words to portray Republicans/Conservatives as being extreme.

Like many blacks, I have high blood pressure issues. Thus, I can not allow these people to get to me.

Still, I could not believe that CNN chose Donna Brazile to be an on-set daily contributor to their Republican National Convention coverage. Give me a break! This black woman is a viscous hate-filled Democrat hack. Nothing coming out of her mouth is going to be fair, balanced or reasonable. But, I counted to ten and felt a little better.

Then, there was the Obama minion on an ABC webcast who said referring to the Romneys, “Happy to have a party when black people drown.” Thank God, this arrogant stupid liberal jerk was immediately fired; in my option, not for his comment, but for getting caught on a live microphone. http://www.breitbart.com/Big-Journalism/2012/08/29/Shock-ABC-News-Romneys-Party-As-Black-People-Die

Folks, please forgive my passion. I do not like calling people “arrogant stupid liberal jerks”. But, their smugness in their evil erroneous assumptions raises my blood pressure.

Reagan said, “Well, the trouble with our liberal friends is not that they’re ignorant; it’s just that they know so much that isn’t so.” http://www.hark.com/clips/dlvxhnstwz-the-trouble-with-our-liberal-friends

A wacko black journalist on MSNBC alleged that the Romney Campaign was “using coded language in order to “n—-rize” President Obama.” http://www.blackyouthproject.com/2012/08/msnbcs-toure-romney-is-trying-to-niggerize-obama-campaign/ Have you heard ANY media outrage about Toure’s insane, divisive, hate and potentially violence inspiring statement? I think not.

This is the same mainstream media that said nothing when Congressional Black Caucus members proclaimed, “the tea party can go to hell” and “the tea party wants to see blacks hanging from a tree”. VP Biden said to a majority black audience, “Republicans want to put y’all back in chains.”

Has the MSM rebuked any of the Democrats’ absurd, hate-filled and over-the-top rhetoric? No. Meanwhile, for four years the MSM has distorted the truth, lied and done everything humanly possible to brand an “R” for racist on the forehead of the Tea Party. These people are EVIL!

A few years ago, black Democrat liberal racist Julianne Malveaux offered her modus operandi for the speedy death of black conservative Justice Clarence Thomas. Malveaux suggested having Thomas’ wife feed him bacon and eggs everyday for breakfast. The media’s response to Malveaux’s death-wish for a U.S. Supreme Court Justice was silence. Can you imagine the media outrage and frenzy had a white Republican/Conservative made such a statement?

Well, Ms Malveaux and Obama media minions, I am tweaking my diet, going to the gym and keeping my blood pressure in check.

Gov. Scott Walker’s victory and the 2010 Tea Party landslide victory proves that your Evil-Empire dominance in the media can be beaten. Informed activist voters and black conservatives, like me, are your worst nightmare. And, with God’s grace, I plan to live a very, very long time.

Lloyd Marcus, Proud Unhyphenated American

Chairman: CampaignToDefeatObama.com

LloydMarcus.com

By Mr. Curmudgeon:

When television reporter Brian Ross erroneously reported that the Colorado “Batman” shooter was a Tea Party member, Ben Sherwood, president of ABC News, said, “Our mission is to tell people everything we can that is relevant about a person who has just committed a terrible crime. If, in the course of our sweeping everything we can about the person, part of it turns out that he was a member of a particular club, a member of a particular organization, he has a particular hobby, if we judge that it is journalistically relevant to a profile, a rich profile of this guy that will help our viewers understand who is this, why did he do this, then we would report the facts,” the New York Times reported.

Sherman did apologize for getting the story wrong but said apologizing for defaming the Tea Party, not to mention endangering the life of the man falsely accused, was “irrelevant to the examination of the event … he [Sherman] would not address that issue because the question was hypothetical.”

With that in mind, let me pose a hypothetical.

Suppose a controversy was raging across the nation over the question of same-sex marriage. Assume that the mayor of Chicago says the chief executive of a Christian-owned fast-food chain’s belief that marriage is the sacred union between a man and a woman precludes that company from doing business in his fair city – until it adopts “Chicago values.” Suppose further that a sitting president, who is on record as having opposed same-sex marriage, now faces an uphill re-election battle and does an abrupt about-face on the issue to garner contributions from Hollywood’s well-heeled gay lobby. Now imagine that his party’s platform is about to pledge the might of its muscular political machine in the crusade to redefine marriage. Finally, suppose a mad gunman shoots and wounds a guard protecting the offices of a Christian think-tank dedicated to “faith, family and freedom in public policy.”

Who do you think will be blamed for inspiring Wednesday’s violence at the Family Research Council?

The Associated Press will no doubt receive heavy criticism for reporting that alleged shooter Floyd Corkins “had been volunteering at a community center for gay, lesbian, bisexual and transgender people.” Who knows, the AP may even receive a slightly agitated visitor at their New York headquarters.

They shouldn’t worry, though. As David Mariner, executive director for the DC Center for the LGBT Community told the AP, the suspected D.C. shooter is “kind, gentle and unassuming.” Theirs might be too … hypothetically.

By Arlette Saenz

EVANSVILLE, Ind. – Mitt Romney lent a hand to a Tea Party-backed Senate candidate, Richard Mourdock, in Indiana today, campaigning with him at a barbecue stop here this afternoon to urge voters to elect the state treasure this fall.

“We got to get this guy elected in the U.S. Senate, you know that,” Romney said to applause from patrons seated at tables in Stepto’s BBQ Shack. “He has proven as the treasurer that he knows how to make sure to balance books. He’s also proven as a campaigner that he can take his message to the people of Indiana. They’ll support him.”

At a stop that had the feel of the Republican primary events held in small restaurants across the country earlier this year, Romney, campaigning with Mourdock for the first time, discussed the common vision he shares with the Indiana Republican to cut spending in Washington.

Read more at ABC News.com

Sarah Palin speaks to a crowd of about 1,000 Ted Cruz supporters on Friday in The Woodlands, Texas. The former Alaska governor and 2008 GOP vice presidential nominee addressed more than 1,000 sweating, enthusiastic supporters of tea party favorite and Republican U.S. Senate candidate Ted Cruz. (Credit: Johnny Hanson/AP -)

By Ellen Nakashima

Posted: July 29th, 2012

Former vice president Richard B. Cheney said the selection of Sarah Palin as the Republican vice presidential candidate in 2008 was “a mistake” — the sort of mistake Mitt Romney should avoid.

In an interview with ABC News, Cheney said Sen. John McCain’s choice of the relatively inexperienced Palin was one “I don’t think was well handled.”

In choosing a running mate, Cheney said, “there are two lists. There is the big list. And it’s got a lot of folks on it.”

To make the smaller list, he said, “the test . . . has to be, ‘Is this person capable of being president of the United States?’ ”

Putting electoral considerations over qualifications is not wise, Cheney told ABC’s Jon Karl in an interview from Cheney’s ranch in Jackson Hole, Wyo., to be aired Monday on ABC news programs and on “Nightline.”

“Those are important issues, but they should never be allowed to override that first proposition. That was one of the problems McCain had,” Cheney said.

“I like Governor Palin,” Cheney said of the former Alaska governor. “I’ve met her. I know her. . . . Attractive candidate. But based on her background, she’d only been governor for, what, two years. I don’t think she passed that test . . . of being ready to take over. And I think that was a mistake.”

Cheney, who is recovering from heart transplant surgery in March, is an old hand at vetting vice-presidential aspirants. He helped Gerald R. Ford and George W. Bush in their searches. He then became Bush’s vice president, serving two terms.

Four years ago, Romney lost out to Palin in the veepstakes. This year Palin, who flirted with a 2012 presidential run, is not believed to be under consideration as a potential running mate. She has not responded to Cheney’s comments.

Read More: WashingtonPost.com

Rush: ‘Blaming Guns For Murder Is Like Blaming Forks For Obesity’

God and guns are the government's number one and two enemies making the individual irrelevant source of picture: freerepublic.com

Imagine if the Aurora gunman knew that people were carrying weapons in the theater like at a gun club. That would have put a lot of ice water on his passion to commit homicides en masse This author can’t recall a single story where there was a massacre like in Colorado at a gun club. He can’t even recall any kind of killing by a deranged gunman at any gun club.

We wonder why. Could it be that at a gun club everyone is packing a gun and that if a nut like the Colorado shooter started to pick people off  he would be dead in a quarter of a second. It’s not the guns that create mass murders. It’s the psychos. Psychopaths and generally severely deranged nuts like to kill defenseless people, but they are not so crazy as to try it at a gun club. Any person with visions of mass killing are clear on one thing. They want to do the killing and do not want to be killed. They are never as deranged as to try mass killing at a place where they know they won’t have much of a chance to succeed or make it out alive.

There is a lesson here for the opportunistic Democrats who are now calling for a special session in Congress for greater gun control. Making people more and more defenseless is what got them killed at the theater to begin with. Honestly, Democrats are death centered people. Getting people killed seems to be what they are good at. They keep making the same case to make people more and more defenseless regardless of the costs to human life as in this discussion on ABC news. They never ever talk about enabling people to defend themselves but always about sacrificing them for the greater good.

Do you remember “Fast and Furious”? The conventional wisdom was that this was a scheme to flood the drug cartels with free guns so as to make a case for greater gun control. The massacre in the movie theater is another liberal opportunity to further gun control which accomplishes the opposite of what is promised namely the safety of the individual. The policy in the movie theater was that guns were not allowed under penalty of felony. The theater demanded that people walk into the theater completely defenseless and it did nothing to make sure adequate security was there. What juicy lawsuits this will make. Imagine, if a handful of people had been allowed to carry their firearms. What a different outcome we might have had when Gabrielle Giffords was shot in the head by a nut like the one in Colorado if people actually had carried guns. What a difference that would have made. Do you remember the Fort Hood massacre where a Muslim extremist did the same as the nut in Aurora? He too knew that everyone on this military base was not allowed to have guns. These nuts are not that crazy. They pick venues where they know people are defenseless to practice their slaughter. The point of mentioning Fast and Furious, the Aurora massacre, Gabrielle Giffords, and Fort Hood is that they all have the same thing in common. People are expected to make themselves defenseless in these venues by the government and when they are sacrificed they are used as props to make people even more defenseless with more gun control.

Now Democrats want greater gun control the very same policy that got these people killed. If all the guns were made illegal, crime would go up not down as was seen in Australia and England when guns were outlawed. Incidentally, Hugo Chavez just outlawed gun ownership in Venezuela and the country has become a total war zone where people are being slaughtered daily. The bad guys keep getting the guns in order to prey on the defenseless which the government has made them so.

Did you know that in Switzerland gun ownership is mandatory? Guns are deeply rooted within Swiss culture – but the gun crime rate is so low that statistics are not even kept.

For some reason, Democrats are more concerned with feel-good policies at the expense of the individual. Look at the gun control laws in Chicago another Democrat bastion. This month more than twice the number of people were killed in Chicago than were in Aurora and not a peep from the mainstream press. Why is that do you suppose? The city is a militarized zone and nothing is done whatsoever to empower the individual to defend himself. Why Democrats are so quick to sacrifice the individual to slaughter is mind boggling at times.  Perhaps, it is because liberals, aka democrats, aka socialists, aka Marxists are always enthusiastic to sacrifice the individual for the good of the collective using the main stream media as its willing accomplice . The individual is irrelevant to the liberal. In fact gun control has nothing to do with crime control and everything to do with keeping politicians safe at the expense of the rest of us and furthering their collective agenda.

There is a very distinctive pattern here. Gun control advocates never think about making people safer. They always focus on making people more defenseless and in the process getting more and more people killed.

President Obama went on a rampage early on his administration to release the inmates at the marine base of Guantanamo Bay. Just recently one of those released master minded the killing of 30 Jews on a bus in Bulgaria. As a matter of fact, many of those released from Guantanamo Bay have gone right back to their terrorist ways. You have got to love this following story. Only 16% of released Guantanamo detainees go back to terrorism. The liberal agenda is taking comfort in the idea that only 16% are killing and maiming others. Oh! Well! As long as it is for the greater good maybe it is worth it.

Obama’s release of the inmate who went on to kill the Jews and gun control have one thing in common. They emanate from liberal policies that have no regard for the ordinary citizen. The liberal policy is one of death and dying. These policies are designed with a willingness to get people killed as long as the liberal agenda is furthered. It all boils down to sacrificing the individual to the collective aka the greater good. This is very obvious.

Ironically, those Democrats in power believe their entourage should be armed to the teeth so they can be adequately protected but the rest of us out here are expected to take a bullet for the greater good. What rot!

The chaos has not even begun to subside from the tragedy in Aurora…

 Same old story

Source:  TPT Community News

Written by: Blaine Dunning @ TeaPartyInfidel.com

Brian Ross and ABC news clearly failed as a journalist trying to link the shooter to the Tea Party before checking on the facts. Of course that has never stopped the media, facts don’t matter especially when trying to link the Tea Party to violence. This scenario was played out in Tucson, The Sheriff Dupnik of Pima County and the pundits around the country falling all over themselves blaming the Tea Party. They have a narrative against the Tea Party in the MSM and I see no changes coming from them. Remember everybody that mass shooting have been around long before the Tea Party, something else the main stream media never seems to mention.

Then once again the rants have started again, gun control, violent movies and video games as the cause for a madman’s rampage. You will get a hundred points of view about why these horrific events happen here in America. It’s certainly way to early to be predicting anything about this shooters motives, of course that doesn’t stop anybody in the media. We always see the media trying to sensationalize these events, maybe that is a statement for the short attention span of Americans.

Why they blame the Tea Party

This is of course is two-fold as the left leaning media doesn’t like the philosophy of limited government, lower taxes and their dislike of Obama’s policies or agenda. The other one is they are defenders of the second amendment, believing its everyone’s right to own a gun or not to. That the founders believed we needed an armed population to defend ourselves and against the government. Times have changed, so has weapons but you wonder if their view would be changed even by acts of madness by deranged people. The Tea Party makes signs about we came unarmed this time, by ballots or bullets change is coming and so on. Ask a Tea Party person what they prefer to happen? They simply are looking for change never hoping it comes to anything other than the ballot box, the left media conveniently overlooks this.

There has always been crazy people, there always will be crazy people and events like this will continue to happen. We will learn in the coming months whether their was signs about the shooter and were they missed by people around him. The Tucson shooting could have been avoided for the signs were there, people simply ignored them. Something happened or the signs were missed about this young man, the blame however should be placed on his shoulders. Nobody else planned this, nobody else pulled the trigger or threw the tear gas in that movie theater. Let’s keep the blame where it belongs.

No amount of words or sympathies Photo: We are asking everyone to please take a moment out of your day to say a prayer for the Aurora, CO community. Our thoughts and prayers are with everyone there in their time of need, and they need to know that we are there for them. If you don’t believe in prayer, maybe you can take a moment of contemplation and reflection for that community which has been struck by such tragedy. Click like to join all of America in saying a prayer, or sending your condolences and thoughts, to the community of Aurora, CO today. They need to know their fellow Americans are with them, no matter what side of the aisle you come down on, today, we are on America and our brothers and sisters need us.can describe the anguish Americans feel for the victims, families and friends of what happened in Aurora. We must keep them in our thoughts and prayers while they struggle to understand what has taken place.

The chaos has not even begun to subside from the tragedy in Aurora…

 Same old story

Source:  TPT Community News

Written by: Blaine Dunning @ TeaPartyInfidel.com

Brian Ross and ABC news clearly failed as a journalist trying to link the shooter to the Tea Party before checking on the facts. Of course that has never stopped the media, facts don’t matter especially when trying to link the Tea Party to violence. This scenario was played out in Tucson, The Sheriff Dupnik of Pima County and the pundits around the country falling all over themselves blaming the Tea Party. They have a narrative against the Tea Party in the MSM and I see no changes coming from them. Remember everybody that mass shooting have been around long before the Tea Party, something else the main stream media never seems to mention.

Then once again the rants have started again, gun control, violent movies and video games as the cause for a madman’s rampage. You will get a hundred points of view about why these horrific events happen here in America. It’s certainly way to early to be predicting anything about this shooters motives, of course that doesn’t stop anybody in the media. We always see the media trying to sensationalize these events, maybe that is a statement for the short attention span of Americans.

Why they blame the Tea Party

This is of course is two-fold as the left leaning media doesn’t like the philosophy of limited government, lower taxes and their dislike of Obama’s policies or agenda. The other one is they are defenders of the second amendment, believing its everyone’s right to own a gun or not to. That the founders believed we needed an armed population to defend ourselves and against the government. Times have changed, so has weapons but you wonder if their view would be changed even by acts of madness by deranged people. The Tea Party makes signs about we came unarmed this time, by ballots or bullets change is coming and so on. Ask a Tea Party person what they prefer to happen? They simply are looking for change never hoping it comes to anything other than the ballot box, the left media conveniently overlooks this.

There has always been crazy people, there always will be crazy people and events like this will continue to happen. We will learn in the coming months whether their was signs about the shooter and were they missed by people around him. The Tucson shooting could have been avoided for the signs were there, people simply ignored them. Something happened or the signs were missed about this young man, the blame however should be placed on his shoulders. Nobody else planned this, nobody else pulled the trigger or threw the tear gas in that movie theater. Let’s keep the blame where it belongs.

No amount of words or sympathies Photo: We are asking everyone to please take a moment out of your day to say a prayer for the Aurora, CO community. Our thoughts and prayers are with everyone there in their time of need, and they need to know that we are there for them. If you don’t believe in prayer, maybe you can take a moment of contemplation and reflection for that community which has been struck by such tragedy. Click like to join all of America in saying a prayer, or sending your condolences and thoughts, to the community of Aurora, CO today. They need to know their fellow Americans are with them, no matter what side of the aisle you come down on, today, we are on America and our brothers and sisters need us.can describe the anguish Americans feel for the victims, families and friends of what happened in Aurora. We must keep them in our thoughts and prayers while they struggle to understand what has taken place.

By Mr. Curmudgeon

Brian Ross of ABC News erroneously identified the Aurora, Colorado, movie theater shooter as a member of the Tea Party Patriots. The man accused of firing an assortment of weapons into a packed theater, killed 12 and wounded 59. ABC misidentified James Holmes, the alleged shooter, age 24, as 52-year-old James Holmes of the Colorado Tea Party Patriots.

This, of course, should come as no surprise. Keen observers of the American political scene view The Tea Party as most responsible for the dramatic reversal of fortunes afflicting the Obama presidency and the Democratic Party since the midterm elections of 2010.

With the president’s political viability waning with each dismal economic report, is it any wonder that a desperate Obama-media would further impugn the growing small-government Tea Party movement?

Although ABC eventually posted a correction on its website, the lie is out and viral; I believe Ross’s Tea Party smear was intentional.

The Hitlerian big lies concerning the Tea Party will come fast and furious right up to November 6. This is just the start.

So, let’s make some assumptions about the shooter based on the facts as we know them: James Holmes was attending the University of Colorado Denver/Anschutz Medical Campus – studying neuroscience; He was described by those who knew him as a “super nice kid,” “kinda quiet” and “really smart”; and an ABC news update claims the alleged shooter “dyed his hair like The Joker … a well-known villain in the fictional batman universe.”

We have a very smart university student unable to separate reality from comic book fantasy … smart in the ways of brain science no less. Disseminating fantasies is what the modern university does so well. It does not teach students to think critically in pursuit of the truth. Instead, it teaches Progressive theology that sees as dangerous any challenge to its fragile orthodoxy. Unable to argue the wisdom of its quasi religion, Progressives demonize all challengers, declaring them heretics “outside the mainstream.”

“You see,” says The Joker in the Batman film “The Dark Knight,” “their morals, their code, it’s a bad joke. Dropped at the first sign of trouble. They’re only as good as the world allows them to be. I’ll show you. When the chips are down, these… these civilized people, they’ll eat each other. See, I’m not a monster. I’m just ahead of the curve.”

That is a perfect distillation of the moral relativism disseminated by today’s university system and a jaded mainstream media.

If the mad act of James Holmes has a trigger, it emanates from the relativist moral swamp of our Progressive age.

Under the terms of moral relativism, Brian Ross’s Tea Party slur isn’t necessarily wrong. Ross apologists can simply claim he was “just ahead of the curve.”

During the height of the Bill “Bubba” Clinton scandals, Tonni Morrison, the African-American writer and activist, wrote in The New Yorker magazine:

“White skin notwithstanding, this [Bill Clinton] is our first black President. Blacker than any actual black person who could ever be elected in our children’s lifetime. After all, Clinton displays almost every trope of blackness: single-parent household, born poor, working-class, saxophone-playing, McDonald’s-and-junk-food-loving boy from Arkansas. And when virtually all the African-American Clinton appointees began, one by one, to disappear, when the President’s body, his privacy, his unpoliced sexuality became the focus of the persecution, when he was metaphorically seized and bodysearched, who could gainsay these black men who knew whereof they spoke? The message was clear ‘No matter how smart you are, how hard you work, how much coin you earn for us, we will put you in your place or put you out of the place you have somehow, albeit with our permission, achieved. You will be fired from your job, sent away in disgrace, and – who knows? – maybe sentenced and jailed to boot. In short, unless you do as we say (i.e., assimilate at once), your expletives belong to us.’”

The latest Newsweek magazine cover trumped Morrison’s claim by declaring President Obama “The First Gay President.”

Before writer Andrew Sullivan began recounting his personal reaction to the president’s new-found support for gay marriage, he first described the dark stage that served as a backdrop to the bright light that followed the president’s pronouncement:

“The interview [Obama on ABC News], by coincidence, came the day after North Carolina voted emphatically to ban all rights for gay couples in the state constitution. For gay Americans and their families, the emotional darkness of Tuesday night became a canvas on which Obama could paint a widening dawn. But I didn’t expect it. Like many others, I braced myself for disappointment. And yet when I watched the interview, the tears came flooding down … To have the president of the United States affirm my humanity – and the humanity of all gay Americans – was, unexpectedly, a watershed. He shifted the mainstream in one interview … Mitt Romney could only stutter.”

Both Tonni Morrison and Andrew Sullivan speak of transformation – turning the white Bill Clinton into the first African-American president, and the nation’s first genuine African-American president into the first homosexual chief executive. I see tangible religious overtones to both declarations of faith.

Among Catholics, it is known as the doctrine of transubstantiation – the moment when the Eucharist transforms into the body of Christ and the sacramental wine transmutes into his blood. This puts the lie to the claim that Progressives have no religion. For Progressives, certain leaders take on a sacramental quality –symbols linking our world with the one that lies beyond, in the realm of unseen truth.

Ideals like individual liberty, the union of one man and one woman, even the definition of life in the womb must change to accommodate the new Progressive faith.

Much to his credit, Sullivan’s journalistic skepticism eventually kicked in. “There was, of course, cold politics behind it,” wrote Sullivan of Obama’s same-sex marriage about-face, “One in six of Obama’s fundraising bundlers is gay, and he needs their money. Wall Street has not backed him financially this year the way it did in 2008. A few Jewish donors have held back over Israel. And when Obama announced recently that he would not issue an executive order barring antigay discrimination for federal contractors, the gay donors all but threatened to leave him high and dry. The unity and intensity of the gay power brokers – absent in the defensive crouch of the Clinton years – proved that FDR’s maxim still applied: ‘I agree with you. I want to do it, now make me do it.’”

In the end, the fuel that propels the new Progressive religion is not faith but money. And their creed is simple and straightforward: “Unless you do as we say (i.e., assimilate at once), your expletives belong to us.”

So, can we please get serious for one moment and ask: Who will be the first extraterrestrial president?

Bristol Palin says children do better with a mother and father. Palin quickly drew fire from critics who note she was an unwed mother at age 17. / AP PHOTO

Source: Detroit Free Press

Posted: May 12th, 2012

President Barack Obama is seen on a monitor in the White House briefing room in Washington, Wednesday, May 9, 2012.

Source: DailyMail.co.uk

By: Michael Zennie and Thomas Durante ABC News interview aired.

One contributor, Stuart Kopperman – who married his gay partner in Washington, D.C. – told the Associated Press that he made a $25 contribution to the Obama campaign ‘to say thank you.’

But while numerous gay rights advocates and celebrities applauded Obama’s announcement on Wednesday, Republicans were quick to take jabs at the commander-in-chief.

Republican National Committee Chairman Reince Priebus accused Obama of placating to voters.

Priebus said in a statement: ‘While President Obama has played politics on this issue, the Republican Party and our presumptive nominee Mitt Romney have been clear.

Source: The Intel Hub

Posted: April 6th, 2012

The Department of Justice is currently carrying out a large scale investigation into what they have called racial profiling throughout Arizona Sheriff Joe Arpaio’s office.

These so far unproven charges come as Arpaio continues his groundbreaking cold case posse investigation into Obama’s fraudulent birth certificate and Selective Service card.

Negotiations between the two sides have come to a halt after Arpaio, refusing to bow to a clear cut federal power grab, refused to allow a government run embedded monitor in his office.

An article from Abc News essentially came from the controlled government perspective that it is somehow odd that an elected sheriff would not let the federal government hijack his department.

The Justice Department has cut off negotiations with Sheriff Joe Arpaio and officials with the Maricopa County, Ariz., Sheriff’s Office in its effort to install an independent monitor to rein in the unconstitutional tactics used by officers there.

Arpaio, who calls himself “America’s Toughest Sheriff,” defied the Justice Department suggestion that it could sue the county and the sheriff’s office to force the issue.

“I am the constitutionally and legitimately elected Sheriff and I absolutely refuse to surrender my responsibility to the federal government,” he said in a letter the Justice Department today. “And so to the Obama administration, who is attempting to strong arm me into submission only for its political gain, I say, ‘This will not happen, not on my watch!

Meanwhile, the chief prosecutor of Maricopa County Arizona has accused the DOJ of spreading misinformation and attempting to foment unrest in Arizona.

Demanding that the feds put up or shut up, Maricopa County Attorney Bill Montgomery has called out the Federal Government with his clear and public call for information on the case to be released, if it exists.

Maricopa County Attorney Bill Montgomery accused federal officials of spreading misinformation and trying to foment unrest in Maricopa County by not providing proof that Sheriff Joe Arpaio’s agency engages in discriminatory police practices.

Montgomery on Wednesday made his strongest statements yet about the investigation into Arpaio’s office, calling on the U.S. Department of Justice to “put up or shut up” by disclosing what evidence it has in its case.

……..

“I want to make it absolutely clear: If the Department of Justice actually has information that supports their assertion that there continue to this day systemic concerns of discriminatory policing or racial profiling, I demand — I demand as the chief prosecutor of Maricopa County, I demand as the duly elected officer with responsibility for prosecutions — to be given that information immediately,” Montgomery said. “This posturing, this playing hide the ball in the context of civil litigation, is disgusting, particularly when it involves criminal prosecutions.” Source: AZCentral

In an article on Infowars.com, Patrick Henningsen pointed out the connections between the racial profiling investigation and Obama’s push to secure the Hispanic vote as well as the Cold Case Posse’s investigation into Obama himself.

There may be other political reasons to force an Arpaio resignation in 2012, besides what critics claim as currying favor with Arizona’s hispanic voting bloc before the November elections. Not least of all, is because of the Sheriff’s Office’s own Cold Case Posse law enforcement investigation into the validity of President Obama’s birth certificate and Selective Service draft card.

According to his team, early returns for the investigation have turned up conclusive evidence on two counts. “What we are looking at is two possible forged government documents”, explains Arpaio.

In the past Arapio has publicly claimed that the DOJ is targeting over a dozen different sheriffs throughout the country in a bid to fully control locally elected sheriffs.

You can watch an interview with Sheriff Arpaio from the local CBS affiliate below: